UPDATE: Hugh Jessiman re-signed -- see Howlings for a couple of quotes from Huge. Blue Notes reports on the Blues possibly being interested in Brendan Shanahan. Prospect Park says look for the Rangers' youngsters to take team leadership roles during the season. MSG.com quotes readers who have already moved on past Jagr and Avery (including two Blueshirt Bulletin copy editors, Pat Hoffman and Dan Akeson).
News in Rangerland is pretty light these days, what with the Rangers having already used up all their cap space in remaking their roster. The depth chart is being filled with the re-signing of RFAs -- Greg Moore became the second to last to re-up today (see NYR.com), leaving Fred Sjostrom as the lone remaining player left to be inked. With the dearth of hard news, some observers have turned toward analyzing what has been done to the Blueshirts this summer -- Larry Brooks in the Post and Sam Weinman in Rangers Report express their reservations, evoking the ghost of the bad old days from before the lockout.
We have begun the process of analyzing the moves as well. But we cannot bring ourselves to rush to judgement in advance of seeing how things shape up on the ice, not after what we witnessed coming out of the lockout when the Rangers were reshaped in the image of Jaromir Jagr back when his reputation was still tarnished by his unfortunate tenure in Washington. We were as surprised as anyone when the Rangers did not finish last, as widely predicted, and made the playoffs three years running. This year, the strategy has changed, as we write in the first installment of our series of analyses at Blueshirt Bulletin+:
The Rangers have made over their team drastically this summer, and in the process have chosen to bank heavily on the "change of scenery" theory. Wade Redden was just about run out of town in Ottawa and has explicitly stated that a new start was the best antidote to a game that had grown stale. Nikolai Zherdev had been on the trading block for at least a season and half while in Columbus, where demanding coach Ken Hitchcock had him in and out of the dog house and was never going to trust him. On a lesser scale, Dmitri Kalinin had run afoul of Sabres fans in Buffalo and needed a new team with which to prove himself.
Then there is Markus Naslund, a goal scorer and point producer whose numbers have dropped by nearly half since his career season of 2002-03 and by more than a third of his five-year pre-lockout averages. We've barely seen Naslund play and therefore know little about him, even though we had an au pair helping us raise our daughter a number of years back who went to high school with him (and Peter Forsberg) back in the small northern Swedish hockey town of Ornskoldsvik. But we've caught up with him on video and researched what was being said about him by the Canuck organization, the Vancouver press, and the team's fans, and there is little question that his (and the Rangers') big hope is to be revitalized by a change of venue.
To read the complete article, go to Blueshirt Bulletin+. You must be Blueshirt Bulletin subscriber to access BB+ -- if you have already subscribed but have not yet learned how to access BB+, E-mail your name and address to Blueshirt@mindspring.com to get the details. If you would like to subscriber to Blueshirt Bulletin and gain access to BB+, drop us an E-mail or click here to download a form that has subscription rates and contact information. Please note that we are unable to process phone orders during the summer, with our offices closed -- quick access can be gained via E-mail, PayPal, or Fax. You can also send a check via regular mail (remember to include your E-mail address), but there will be delay in processing orders received that way.
By gaining access to BB+ you will not only be able to see our analysis of Naslund and his change in scenery, as well as upcoming installments on Zherdev and Redden, you will also be able to read recent entries, which include interviews with prospects Mitch Gaulton and Max Campbell and an interview with Glen Sather about Jagr, Zherdev, and Mats Sundin. Another upcoming BB+ posting will be an interview with first round draftee Mike Del Zotto. Our traditional wall-to-wall training camp coverage will also appear mostly on BB+ this year, as will coverage of the Rangers' European road trip if we are able to travel there with them.
Finally, if you are in need of some hearty laughs, check out the Islander Follies at SI.com (thanks to BB reader PJ for directing our attention to this priceless photo series).
I'm talking about the roster on the website. The rangers do not control the Nhl shop.
Posted by: roc | July 22, 2008 at 08:19 PM
i dont get the issue with Zherdev
Are you suggesting a trade or something?
Ranger news is at the peak of it's boredom
Posted by: bdubs | July 22, 2008 at 08:27 PM
Rangers dont control the website ether anymore
Posted by: Ant | July 22, 2008 at 08:33 PM
bdubs hes trying to start the sundin rumor again
Posted by: Ant | July 22, 2008 at 08:35 PM
My guess is the issue is not whether zherdev is going to be a ranger or not, but that he was listed as #13 on the team website until recently. He does not have that number anymore on the site and some people are hoping it is because sundin is coming (he isn't in my opinion) and he is going to get #13. On another note, the coyotes finally resigned carcillo (according to tsn), so that is one offer sheet some people would have like to see us make that is no longer possible.
Posted by: Wicky229 | July 22, 2008 at 08:36 PM
seriously what is the deal with shanny?
Posted by: jagrmiester | July 22, 2008 at 08:39 PM
Guys do the math we have a mill or 2 left even if we trade pruchs wel have 3 mills why in the world would Sundin sign for pennies with us if we can get 6/7 hell 10 mills from other teams.As much as i hope for us to win hte cup i doubt itll happen this season so theres no point of him coming for 3 mills to the blueshirts.I say hel go to Det cause that team will be unreal this season
Posted by: Ant | July 22, 2008 at 08:40 PM
Sorry ant, your post was not there when I made mine. Glad the pens traded carcillo to the yotes, would hae hated to see that guy 6 times a season.
Posted by: Wicky229 | July 22, 2008 at 08:40 PM
Sundin wouldve been good for Jags we have a speedy team he wont eb able to keep up itll be shanny last year all over again
Posted by: Ant | July 22, 2008 at 08:41 PM
wicky amen to that lol
Posted by: Ant | July 22, 2008 at 08:42 PM
If money was the only object to Sundin, he would've signed with Vancouver already. No one will come close to that offer. If tradition was the only object to him, he would've signed with Montreal already.
He is taking his time, but I do not suspect that the only reason is that he cannot make up his mind between competing offers. I would guess that the longer he waits the fewer teams there will be that CAN sign him. So my guess is that he is waiting for something to happen that none of us know about. That's not to say that he will end up on Broadway.
Posted by: smitty | July 22, 2008 at 09:19 PM
.....Well i bet my eyes and organs to greg l
and i believe I said I would give my male parts to Rosie O'donnell
Posted by: bdubs | July 22, 2008 at 09:35 PM
for Sundin not coming to NY
Posted by: bdubs | July 22, 2008 at 09:36 PM
Jason,
Good call.
Still don't think him being swedish had anything to do with our interest in him. Maybe Lundqvist and Sjostrom being on the team was a minor selling point to Naslund, but I don't think it's as big of a deal as people make it out to be.
Posted by: Jameson | July 22, 2008 at 10:21 PM
Smitty,
I don't think it's so hard to believe that Sundin isn't sure of what he wants. He did not want to leave Toronto at the deadline, and maybe he's not sure what he's even looking for. The last I read on TSN it seems like retirement from the NHL is a serious option for Sundin. If I were in his shoes, I wouldn't know if I wanted to go for the money, go for the tradition, wait for more options, wait for less options, retire and go back to Europe or what. Guess we'll just have to wait and see what happens.
Posted by: Jameson | July 22, 2008 at 10:24 PM
Jameson,
Naslund said in his conference call that one of the reasons (other than the money) he wanted to become a Ranger was to play with Lundqvist.
Posted by: jason | July 22, 2008 at 10:56 PM
Is Greg Moore related to Dominick Moore?
Posted by: music11 | July 22, 2008 at 11:18 PM
Bdubs-
Grow up. This site should be fun. There is really nothing else to talk about.
Posted by: roc | July 22, 2008 at 11:46 PM
There were three Moore brothers who played at Harvard, Mark, Steve & Dominic. Greg Moore is not related to them.
Posted by: Jxmarts | July 22, 2008 at 11:47 PM
That would be cool if we signed Sundin but I have no idea how we'd fit him in our lineup. If anything I'd say were short a top 6 wing but i think that would be nice to see a Naslund Sundin Sjostrom line.. I think Sjostrom is very underrated and would produce if he played with better players and more ice-time but who knows..just a nice thought
Posted by: stillz | July 23, 2008 at 12:32 AM
That would be cool if we signed Sundin but I have no idea how we'd fit him in our lineup. If anything I'd say were short a top 6 wing but i think that would be nice to see a Naslund Sundin Sjostrom line.. I think Sjostrom is very underrated and would produce if he played with better players and more ice-time but who knows..just a nice thought
Posted by: stillz | July 23, 2008 at 12:32 AM
Jason,
That's what I said. I also said I doubt that the Rangers interest in him (NOT Naslund's interest in us) had much to do with the fact that he was swedish.
Posted by: Jameson | July 23, 2008 at 08:53 AM
Jameson,
Well, if you put it in those words... you're right, I agree with you. Chalk that up to me not reading and just glancing instead.
Posted by: jason | July 23, 2008 at 09:20 AM
I think they are going to trade Sjostrom and Prucha especially if they sign Sundin.
Posted by: roc | July 23, 2008 at 10:53 AM
Sundin is thinkin about playing for the Rangers but we need to trade someone to get his salary to fit in...hard thing to do for most G.M 's , but Sather is n't your run of the mill G.M . We 'll see how it plays out ...poor Bduds , he's gonna have to go under the knife . I have to collect whats mine!!!
Posted by: Greg L. ( the Original one ) | July 23, 2008 at 01:27 PM
wow i might have to movie to russia or the Czech Republic thats where the party is at this year!
Posted by: jagrmiester | July 23, 2008 at 01:47 PM
Dubi - which of the players on the Rangers and top hartford guys do not have to go through waivers this coming year in order to move back and forth from NHL and AHL.
Posted by: LI Joe | July 23, 2008 at 02:08 PM
Dubi - your pic of july 1st. I thought that might be Sjostrom standing next to Henrik and not Avery. or am I mistaken.
Posted by: LI Joe | July 23, 2008 at 02:10 PM
Joe, based on my calculations of a complicated process, everyone who played regularly as a Ranger last season (that includes Staal, Dubinsky, Callahan, Dawes, and Girardi) require waivers, along with a handful of guys who played in Hartford -- Parenteau, Pock, and Fahey. I'm not sure about the 24-year-olds -- Moore, Jessiman, and Potter -- but I believe they are all still exempt from waivers for one last season.
The photo in question is definitely Avery.
Posted by: Dubi | July 23, 2008 at 02:51 PM
Jameson, two of the pickups the Rangers made at the trade deadline were both Swedes. The Rangers also worked to make a comfortable "cultural" environment for Jagr when he was here by bringing in a lot of Czechs.
This is speculation on my part, but so be it--the organization has proven it likes to give its superstars countrymen around them to make them feel more at home.
G
Posted by: Godot | July 23, 2008 at 03:01 PM
Dubi - thanks. what about the new acquisitions. the swedish Sean Avery and the other "younger" free agents signed.
Posted by: LI Joe | July 23, 2008 at 04:21 PM
jagrmeister
Apparently there are some things we can agree on. Cheers
Posted by: paul arensburg | July 23, 2008 at 06:27 PM
gonna have to altar my summer plans next year and go to CR or Russia ha and check it out.
Posted by: jagrmiester | July 23, 2008 at 06:43 PM
Godot
Believe what you want but when it comes down to it, it's about what the player can bring to the franchise. Who were we trying to please when we let Nylander go and signed Drury and Gomez instead? Did we bring up dubinsky to play with fellow americans Drury and Gomez? Did we sign Redden so that Staal and Girardi had another Canadian to hang out with? I'm sure it's nice for Lundqvist to have a few guys that are from sweden but it's not a big deal, his english is perfect, and from what I could tell one of his best friends from the team last year was Shanahan, and he's far from swedish. With Jagr I think it was a lot different, not only am I sure he prefers his native tongue as his english is kind of sketchy but there's a unique playing style that most players from the czech republic, slovakia, russia, etc. have as compared to north americans and players from northern europe like finland and sweden. I tend to feel those guys play a much more north american kind of game, and that's probably a bigger reason why most of the non-north american players we have seem to be Swedish these days, as opposed to management saying "Hey lundqvist is good lets stock up on people from his homeland."
Posted by: Jameson | July 23, 2008 at 07:53 PM
Jameson,
you make it sound like I said the only reason why they went with Naslund is because he's Swedish. Or that they only went after Swedes. No, what I believe is that when it comes to pursuing two or three players with similar qualities, might not such an intangible play into the decision making?
Posted by: Godot | July 23, 2008 at 10:27 PM
i was watching Fans most wanted show and i just realized how much i miss Jags even more blah.
Posted by: jagrmiester | July 23, 2008 at 11:37 PM
Godot,
Honestly, I don't think so. There is an endless list of relevant things you can judge a player on, in the salary cap era I don't think the fact that a free agent or a player you're trading for shares the same nationality as one of your stars is nowhere near the top of that list, and no way it'd actually be a reason why a team would sign someone, at least in this case.
Now as for a player wanting to go to a team that has players he will feel comfortable with, is a completely different story. The perfect example is that rookie free agent that a handful of teams were interested in from Sweden, he ended up signing in Detroit who have a decent amount of swedes themselves, but there were talks about Vancouver for the Sedin brothers, the Rangers because of Lundqvist, etc.
Posted by: Jameson | July 24, 2008 at 12:41 AM
jagrmiester
Thats why i dont watch that show.I miss the dude already and the season didnt even star
Posted by: Ant | July 24, 2008 at 10:49 AM
jagrmiester...
I know what you mean. I watched fans most wanted about a week ago, and had to change it.
Posted by: NYR777 | July 24, 2008 at 11:21 AM
i literally got chills when Jagr scored last night for some reason :(, I cant wait for summer to be over with.
Posted by: jagrmiester | July 24, 2008 at 11:51 AM
Pruchas salary is 1.6 m. how do you trade him when he was such a big scratch last year? You don't unless you make a bigger trade with one of the teams way below salary cap or put him on waivers and have him come back in the league at half the cost.
Posted by: rcm | July 24, 2008 at 12:47 PM
Prucha can just be buried in the AHL, and his salary is moot, correct?
And not to throw gas on the insane rumor theories, but I would imagine the #1 reason Naslund was signed (as far as I am concerned) was as a precursor to bringing in his pal, Sundin. Sundin makes no sense to me (although I was all for it 3 years ago), but NYR are missing the one thing it has always had: A MARQUEE PLAYER!!!!
Posted by: cwgatti | July 24, 2008 at 01:51 PM
Rcm,
Prucha had a bad year last year but you can't deny he's got talent. It's not as though he is 30 and his prime passed, and you don't just wake up and forget how to score goals. There are plenty of teams out there, at least in my opinion, that would be more than happy to trade for Prucha and put him on their 2nd or 3rd line and see if he can't score 20 to 30 goals like he did his first two seasons in the NHL.
I don't think Sundin is even remotely in the picture with the Rangers, it's just about mathematically impossible we sign him. I don't think Shanahan is returning. With the trading of Hollweg there's a lot less question marks. We could keep all the guys that should absolutely be in the NHL and have 3 healthy scratches.
C: Drury, Gomez, Dubinsky, Fritsche, betts
W: Naslund, Zherdev, Dawes, Callahan, Prucha, Sjostrom, Voros, (Rissmiller), (Orr)
D: Roszival, Redden, Girardi, Staal, Mara, Kalinin, (Pock)
G: Lundqvist, Valiquette
So I think we may just be set when it comes to the roster. If Korpikoski really wows during TC maybe we try to make room for his salary. If Moore, Byers, etc. really play well enough to earn a spot ont he 4th line maybe we waive Voros and/or Rissmiller or banish them to Hartford before Waivers are even in effect. But I don't see much else happening here. Prucha seems to be part of the picture now.
Posted by: Jameson | July 24, 2008 at 01:52 PM
Voros has a three year deal. I highly doubt he gets banished to Hartford. Rissmiller and Fritsche have smaller terms, so maybe they are candidates, but I have a feeling that these guys wouldn't be signed unless they are in the teams plans. I think Renney figured that Korp and Moore, along with Potter would be on the team this year, but that looks pretty much impossible, especially with a downsized training camp with the pressure of having the team ready for it's European working vacation. That said, I think the Roster you projected is exactly how I see it, except I'm not sure the organization wants to keep Pock as it's 7th D-man. I would have Orr, Rissmiller and Pock as my Black aces, but I think Renney really likes Orr in there.
I know it's futile to draw up line combos, but here are some lines I would like to look at:
Dawes-Gomez-Zherdev
Naslund-Drury-Prucha
Fritsche-Dubinsky-Callahan
Voros-Betts-Sjostrom
(Rissmiller-Orr)
I don't see Naslund working out with the other two guys. Dawes works well with Gomez and he is strictly a finisher on that line. Same with Prucha. Of course there is no size on either of the top two lines (Maybe Voros gets a look there), but I love the feisty and potentially offensive fritsche-Dubi-Cally line. Talk about sandpaper!
Posted by: Colorado Mark | July 24, 2008 at 02:31 PM
I meant I don't see Naslund working out with Gomez and NZ.
Posted by: Colorado Mark | July 24, 2008 at 02:31 PM
"Prucha can just be buried in the AHL, and his salary is moot, correct? "
Don't think so. The salary counts against the team. Teams objective should be to get rid of that type salary for a player that shows so little time on the ice. His 1st year was good. I have reservations whether the coaching staff still thinks the same.
Posted by: rcm | July 24, 2008 at 02:56 PM
Jameson
I agree with you about sundin, just do not think he is coming and with shanny as well. Probably not going to be back. I think the positional roster shakes down like so (my early early assessment):
centers:dru, gomer, dubi (betts or fritsche)
wings: cally, dawes, naslund, zherdev, orr, voros, sjo (if he signs), and (prucha, jamtin, rissmiller, korpi, or AA).
D men: redden, staal, girardi, kalinin, rozy, mara, and at #7 (denisov). I just think pock is out of favor with the big club and will be with the pack. I like what I have read about denisov and would like to see him in the line up, but do not see him replacing one of the higher priced guys ahead of him, but you never know.
Goal: we all know the two here.
This is all just tinkering and opinion by me, barring trades and the like. Guys I listed at center could play wing of vice versa of course. Looks like 6 or 7 forwards fighting for just a couple of positions, I really think orr will be a regular in the line up. And the d and goal is basically set.
Thanks folks and bombs away!!
Posted by: Wicky229 | July 24, 2008 at 02:57 PM
who knows if this Voros is good anyways or Rissmiller.
Posted by: jagrmiester | July 24, 2008 at 03:59 PM
i think Voros and rissmiller are jason ward type playersexcept bigger. suggesting that they go on the top line is absurd.
Sundin- my eyes, male parts and organs are saying he wont be a ranger
Posted by: bdubs | July 24, 2008 at 05:53 PM
Rcm,
If we were to send Prucha down, which I really don't see happening because a) if we're going to dump his salary we may as well dump it in a trade even if it's for minimal value and b) If it's after September he'd be claimed on waivers without a doubt; it wouldn't count against the cap. Just think back to the last season or two when we had injuries on defense. We had Kasparitis, Hutchinson, and Pock all in hartford at some point over those two years when we could've used them on the big club and couldn't bring them up because we couldn't fit their salary or they'd be claimed. Al Montoya, a huge reason he never got a chance as Lundqvist's backup was because he would be counting a lot more towards the cap than Vaiquette did.
Posted by: Jameson | July 24, 2008 at 06:11 PM