If the Rangers go into Philadelphia this afternoon and really use the lines that were seen in practice Friday (as relayed in Rangers Report), there are only two possible scenarios -- bad and not bad. Bad if this odd mixture of skill sets does not yield enough goals to beat the lowly Flyers, who may have Peter Forsberg back in the line-up -- not bad if the Rangers beat the Flyers, as they should, but take away false hope that these makeshift lines made the difference. It's hard to imagine an outcome that can be uncategorically characterized as good, unless the Rangers simply blow the Flyers out with a reinvigorated power play.
At issue, at least the way it looks from here, is the lack of a clear identity on any line if Martin Straka is unable to play because of the flu -- and if he is available, then all you can do is subtract one line, the top line, from the list, and still be left scratching your head about what you get from the other lines.
Start with the second line, so named only because Brendan Shanahan is on it. He will apparently skate with Blair Betts centering and Marcel Hossa on the opposite wing -- which, as we noted after the loss in New Jersey, gives him a pair of linemates with four assists between them in 1,861 shifts so far this season, not exactly the proper prescription for a sniper in search of set-up men. Shanahan, with just two goals in his last 19 games, will essentially be on a checking line with two linemates who have been checking forwards all season long.
A third line of Matt Cullen centering Petr Prucha and Jed Ortmeyer is more likely to generate offense that Shanahan's second line, depending on which of the two lines draws the assignment of stopping Philadelphia's top line (which really means Simon Gagne and Mike Knuble, still capable of killing the Rangers despite the feebleness of their team) -- Coach Renney is unlikely to use a line with Prucha on it as a stopper. Cullen and Prucha at least have the benefit of having been linemates much of the season, and without having to worry about setting up Shanahan, they may just be able to loosen up and fare well. Having the relentlessly hard working Ortmeyer forechecking and backchecking on their behalf will probably free them up even more.
The best you can say about a fourth line featuring Jason Krog between Ryan Hollweg and Adam Hall is that at least Hollweg will throw some hits in the meager amount of ice time this unit is likely to get. The only possible permutation to all this is if Straka can play and Jason Ward replaces Hall on the fourth line or is the healthy scracth himself. At least in that case the Rangers will have their top unit available to (theoretically) demolish the fragile Flyer defense. Without Straka, Jaromir Jagr will lose the most valuable weak side option he's had all season when double teamed and Michael Nylander will lose the only passing option he's had aside from Jagr.
Jagr will continue to play with his favorite defensive pair, Marek Malik and Michal Rozsival; Aaron Ward will team up with Karel Rachunek, with one of the right defensemen moving to the left side; and Fedor Tyutin will draw the assignment of mentoring Dan Girardi in his NHL debut, with Tyutin still the Rangers' steadiest defenseman despite some shaky play of late. Thomas Pock will join Colton Orr in the press box -- while Pock has played well and deserved to keep playing, one should note that his strength is the offensive side of the game, and he has yet to record a single point since his return to semi-regular action in mid-December (his only goal and only assist of the season came against the Flyers in early October).
The Rangers better not thake the Flyers lightly -- check out their line-up in this Philly-area report, they are nearly fully healthy and still have some weapons. In other news today, Sam Weinman gets himself in the middle between Jagr and Shanahan on the crucial issue of how to run the power play -- see the Journal News and Rangers Report. Other game day reports in the News and Post. Hartford won on a pair of Brad Isbister goals and a good power play -- see the Courant (Mitch Beck will have a recap of this weekend's Wolf Pack action tomorrow). In Charlotte, goals by Bruce Graham and Lee Falardeau were not enough to avoid a blowout loss. In juniors, Steve Colbert of the Colber Report backed the Saginaw Spirit against the Oshawa Generals. Jess Rubenstein has the result in Prospect Park:
As you get ready for a Ranger afternoon game, how about a very busy Friday night in prospect hockey to get you going? We start with the latest on Marc-Andre Cliche of Lewiston, which is to say no news as of this report. Cliche was injured during the Halifax-Lewiston match on Thursday. Depending on which side you listen to, it was a clean hit or it was dirty. The MAINEaics are being tight lipped on this mainly because if they report that Cliche has suffered a concussion then he has to sit out no less than seven days under CHL rules. Without their captain in the lineup, the MAINEaics dropped a 2-1 decision to Cape Breton. David Kveton and Gatineau lost to Moncton 3-2 despite Kveton’s 12th assist of the season.
Switching to the college ranks, Greg Beller returned to the Yale lineup but was scoreless as Yale lost 2-1 to Rensselaer. Dylan Reese set up the tying goal but Harvard still fell to St. Lawrence. Reese also made one heck of a defensive play as St. Lawrence’s Mike McKenzie thought he had a breakaway but Reese skating at full speed caught up and poked the puck away, a solid defensive play from the Harvard captain, normally known as an offensive defender. Billy Ryan and Maine continued to slump as they lost their fourth game out of their last five, this time to Northeastern, 6-1, with Ryan scoreless. Darin Olver was also scoreless as NMU lost 5-2 to Nebraska-Omaha. Jordan Foote also was scoreless but MTU tied Colorado College 2-2. Kenny Roche had an assist but BC ended BU's unbeaten streak at eight with a 5-2 win.
In the WHL, Brodie Dupont did not score as his Calgary Hitmen lost to Brandon 4-2. Michael Sauer had an assist as Medicine Hat defeated Lethbridge 4-1. Eric Hunter did not score as Prince George lost to Tri-City 2-1. Lukas Zeliska remained out of the Prince Albert lineup as the Raiders defeated Chilliwack 5-4. We believe this to be healthy scratch and not an injury. In the OHL, Marc Staal’s Sudbury Wolves were edged 3-2 by Bellville, Staal held scoreless. Dalyn Flatt did not add to his 137 PIMs but was +1 one as Brampton defeated Erie 3-1. Bobby Sanguinetti did not score but fellow Jersey native Bobby Ryan tied the Owen Sound record for career points with 295 with two goals as the Attack lost 4-2 to Kitchener. Even though Ryan is not a Ranger prospect, we salute his efforts as a local player who has made good.
We saved the best for last, as we first must set the stage. Trevor Koverko led his Oshawa Generals into Saginaw to face the Spirit and the Twin Toms, Pyatt and Zaborsky. But this was not going to be just any game. The Spirit are regular features on The Colbert Report on Comedy Central. Stephen Colbert and the Saginaw Spirit were challenged by the mayor of Oshawa after Colbert complained about being personally attacked by the Generals when fans threw teddy bears on the ice during a recent game. The challenge was this: If the Generals won then Colbert would have to wear a General’s jersey on one of his shows. If the Spirit won then Oshawa would hold a day in Colbert's honor. So let’s get to what was the best game of the night, as both teams appeared to take this challenge to heart.
The game went back and forth all night long as the two teams traded goals. Zaborsky's fifth goal of the month (11th on the season) gave the Spirit a short-lived 3-2 lead. Pyatt set up what turned out to be the game winning goal 1:44 into the third period. For Pyatt it was assist #27 and point #50 as he has regained the lead in the prospect-scoring race from Brodie Dupont. Trevor Koverko had an assist and two more PIMs as the final score was 5-4 Saginaw. So thanks to the Spirit, Colbert will be having a day in his honor in Oshawa.
Stars of the night: First Star -- Tomas Zaborsky (Saginaw OHL) -- He remains hot and this is what we normally do not see from a European player in the second half of a season. Second Star -- Dylan Reese (Harvard) -- It has been a frustrating season for the Crimson but we remain high on Dylan as he has serious potential to become a strong two-way NHL defenseman. We reward not for his assist but his defensive play tonight as he used his speed to stop a scoring chance. Third Star -- Tom Pyatt (Saginaw OHL) -- I call him “Prime Time” because whenever his team needs a big play, Pyatt delivers. Tonight it was setting up the game winner, so I call upon the Rangers to deliver what Pyatt deserves: a Ranger contract.
Gotta be kidding me with crap lines like that. We could probably cut 5 players from the starting lineup and no one would pick them up. Maybe the kids aren't ready but then again neither are the sorry bunch we already have out there.
Go Rangers?
Posted by: Marty | January 27, 2007 at 04:19 AM
Too bad there isn't a second-year minor league assistant coach handy who could explain it Jagr:
"We always want to establish point shots and a net-front presence," Pack assistant coach Ken Gernander said. "We had guys not reluctant to shoot from the points and good traffic that the goalie had to keep his eye on..."
(As quoted by Bruce Berlet this AM)
Posted by: Mark | January 27, 2007 at 08:56 AM
I don't get the Pock benching at the expense of the Girardi call-up, especially in Philly where the Flyers will be hell bent to smear defensemen in the corners on the forecheck. Could be a tough place for Girardi to break in. I wonder if this is a precursor to another move that would involve Pock getting shipped out somewhere as part of a trade to bring in a second line center.
But, after seing Jason Ward promted to the first line earlier in the season I guess anything is possible.
There was a pretty good second line center available during the off season but the Rangers opted for Matt Cullen instead of Marc Savard.
Shanahan was scoring goals earlier in the season with Cullen as his center.
I just don't see Betts and Hossa having the tools necessary to get Shanny going. They both lack the offensive skills to do anything worthy of being promoted to the second line.
I would rather see Immonen between Shanahan and Prucha, Betts between Cullen and Ward and Hollweg between Ortmeyer and Hall. Sit Hossa and Orr and on the defensive side exchange Pock for Malik.
I am at a loss that this time of the season Tom Renney would be putting line combinations together that....well...that don't seem to make any sense.
A loss to the lowly Flyers is not the way to start the "second half" of the season.
I said previously that Girardi had not impressed me during a pre-season game. I hope he has improved his game and comes in with some confidence.
Posted by: Ron Boesgaard | January 27, 2007 at 09:15 AM
Renney amazes me with his inability to get anything from 2/3 of this team.
If I was Hossa, I would give my agent a raise. If I am not mistaken, Hossa held tight to avoid a two-way contract. It's the only reason why he is still an NHL player.
...and I still would love to know why they are so afraid to put Jason Ward on waivers. Which teams are waiting to grab him? If there are any, can we just move him to them for a 10th round pick or something already?
This team is in dire need of some addition by subtraction. They're already about a month too late.
Mitch - I am still waiting for the good news. ;-)
Posted by: Chris QCT | January 27, 2007 at 10:08 AM
Ladied and Gents the season is officially over for us.I have lost all the hope to see rangers win it thsi season.
Its pointless to even sya anything about Renney.Hes a czech lover.He plays Malik no matter what.Hossa and Betts on 2nd enuff said there.
This team is already in the 3rd pl and 9th in the conference.Devils got 15 points on us.Henrik is a great goalie but hes no Brodeur im sorry to say that.
Ozo Pock or any1 of them for malik would be perfect.Kaspar 2 goals and he gets send to minors thats just retarted
Posted by: ant | January 27, 2007 at 10:21 AM
Even betts admitted his game isn't suited to be a playmaking center. what is our coach thinking here? it would be nice if someone could ask him his reasoning for the line combos?...
Posted by: gregg | January 27, 2007 at 10:37 AM
Dubi
"Start with the second line, so named only because Brendan Shanahan is on it." Your on it dead center again. I'd put it a little different. We have a 1st line, then a 4th (a),(b) & (c) lines. Role players have a role (how's that for intuitive reasoning), but 56% of your forwards as role players means you don't win! Your point, exactly.
ChrisQCT
Somebody would pick up Ward and Betts. Now Hossa, Orr, Hall and Krog area another matter. A trade including Cullen is possible, somebody may want a speed guy as a third line center. That would leave Ortmeyer and Hollewg with Betts and Ward. Again, IMO Betts, Ward and Ortmeyer will make a good third line and Hollweg between Dawes and Callahan would be a good energy line. The trade I's like to see is Cullen a draft pick or something for Craig Conroy. He can center Shanny's line.
Posted by: rangerbill94 | January 27, 2007 at 10:40 AM
Bill,
I didn't name the 5 that wouldn't be picked up but Malik & Cullen probably wouldn't be picked up either due to their contracts. Betts & Ward would never see anything above 4th line on any other team that has a coach/GM with common sense.
Posted by: Marty | January 27, 2007 at 10:56 AM
The first game after the all star break has not even been played yet but already the Renney has found a way to sabotage the season. Out of all the possible line combinations to have, I swear he somehow manages to pick the worst ones.
For instance, if Renney insists that Betts and Hossa should be the "second" line, why make Shanahan a fourth liner - if Straka is out why not put Shanahan on the first line. Better yet, why not keep Shanahan on the second line and bring up Immonen or Callahan and Dawes. Even if the prospects struggle, it will be worth it - with the current lines the Rangers will not make the playoffs, or if they somehow sneak in, they probably will get swept like last year - make no mistake, last years team was better. I have been a big proponent to use this season for the kids to get experience this year so management can see which of the kids have a future - so next year they can be a big asset. However, management rather play Ward, Betts, and Hossa.
I would love it if a reporter can ask Renney why he thinks Betts with his 1 assist is a second line center on this team. To be honest, Krog is better than Betts and would be more appropriate there. We have to be real - last year the team had a great run from December coinciding with the Sykora trade to the Olympic break - but other than that they were mostly .500 before, and below .500 after. Renney basically had the team winning for just a small stretch of last season and that had more to do with Jagr, Prucha, and Lundqvist. Renney is bad coach whose decisions are rarely the reason why games are won but the reason why they are lost.
One other thing,I recall that Sather's contract if I not mistaken was 7 years for $35 million - this is year 7 (if the lockout year counted against the players contracts it should also count against managements) - I also know Dolan was interviewed a while back and said Sather can stay as long as he wants - but I wonder if he got a contract extension - maybe if the teams misses the playoffs somebody else can be brought in - but knowing Dolan he probably will bring in Milbury - AHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Brian | January 27, 2007 at 11:44 AM
I would not be surprised if Shanny decides that he wants to escape from this asylum at seasons end. I couldn't say that I would blame him either. There is just no logic at all in any of the moves being made to this team and the end result will be an all too familiar early rendezvous at the golf course...
Posted by: Laserman | January 27, 2007 at 12:32 PM
Hold on now.... Don't despair! Patience.
We have the trade deadline yet for Sather to make his run for eighth place. Look for some "veteran" help soon to get Dolan his ticket price increase.
The "rebuild" in Sather's eyes isn't working... He "tried" it with Hossa, Ward, Betts, Orr, Pock, Immonen, Dawes, Callahan, Orts, Hollweg Racunek, Hall, Prucha, Krog. Hell, he's probably going to count Bobby Granger too.
As Seinfeld said "Soup and a sandwich, THAT'S the dinner...."
Drop dead, Sather. Drop dead, Dolan. Those are the only changes that will matter.
Posted by: T_Bird | January 27, 2007 at 12:59 PM
I still think my theory about Sather's motivation has a good possibility of being true. You know the one, where I accuse Saher of being able to take Dolan's money because he (Dolan) is an idiot, and extracte revenge on the Ranger fans due to his contempt for the former Ranger management who he long despised from his days as Edmonton coach and felt they (the Rangers) took advantage of him in deals.
I know Dubi, and I'm sure others, dispute this theory of mine. I can't say it's fact but my 60 years being a Ranger fan lead me to that hunch. Some hunches do ring true on occasion.
My apologies to those who asked me for the link, that I inadvertently deleted on my computer, to the 1988 video titled "Jay Miller vs McClelland yelling at Sather". I just found a discussion on it on the hockeyfighters.com website but couldn't find a link there to the video clip. I joined up and asked for it. If they provide it for me, I'll post it here and also send it to those who asked me via email for it.
Posted by: lennynyr | January 27, 2007 at 01:37 PM
We are playing the Flyers a team they should be able to beat but the Rangers do not inspire confidence from their fans with their choice of lines.
Then we get to watch the game as Sam and Joe are months behind what you fans have been calling for on the PP but it seems the message still has not gotten though to the players.
Yes they got shots off but none were behind screens.
We have also witnessed another period full of bogus refs who missed or blew calls. How the one in the corner does not call Hatcher for his shot to Tyutin's head is a prime example as to why players wind up hurt when those are the very hits outlawed everywhere but the NHL.
Posted by: Jess | January 27, 2007 at 01:47 PM
Quick - somebody tell Renney that it is ok to make a line change during a power play. I am running out of ways to say he is a terrible coach. He is just a stupid idiot who should be coaching little league baseball rather than pro hockey. With 5 power plays, somehow the first line forwards all have over 6 minutes of PP time - the only other forward with more than 1 minute was Hossa with 1.12 minutes and Prucha has 4 seconds of PP time despite the fact that he was second to Jagr in PP goals last year (16 vs 24). Heck Pruch had more PP goals than Shahahan last year who only had 14 PP goals. The treatment of Prucha, Pock, Dawes, Immonen, and Callahan is unacceptable.
Also, Rozival should be bench the rest of the game for not shooting the puck on the 4-3 PP.
Posted by: Brian | January 27, 2007 at 02:00 PM
Only the Rangers would be tied 1-1 with ALL those opportunities. Renney is a joke.
Posted by: Phill | January 27, 2007 at 02:15 PM
We must miss the playoffs or this insanity will continue. And by we, I mean both Rangers and Knicks. Then, if Dolan doesn't sell the teams, maybe, just maybe, he'll clean house, bring in someone who is not a pretender, and get the hell out of the way.
Posted by: chardkerm | January 27, 2007 at 02:38 PM
We may be outshooting the Phailures by a lot, but they are running us out of the rink physically. They sent out Eager and Fedoruk against the Jagr line. Prucha, that brave little guy is getting plastered against the boards all game long, but keeps getting up and using the body himself. Everyone else should be ashamed of themselves. This is like falling asleep, having a nightmare, then having another nightmare within the nightmare.
Posted by: chardkerm | January 27, 2007 at 02:43 PM
Why is Jagr out there with the net empty? Renney is an effing suckup. Disgusting.
Posted by: chardkerm | January 27, 2007 at 03:25 PM
Guys -
We won, a win is a win - I'm happy, even though we didn't score on the PP and Shanahan & Jagr hit 2 bars a piece...I'm very proud to say I'm giving the first positive post on this thread. As I went to the Atlanta game before the break, this is a pretty similar result, but of course, in reverse with regards to the Rangers:
- No score after the first, with the home team weathering a huge storm.
- Tied at 1 after the second, with Jagr scoring in both games.
- Away team gets the game winning goal on a scramble around the net.
Also, Dubi, I meant to say it was great to meet you at the game. The Betts jersey sure was a dead giveaway.
Posted by: Ed McGrogan | January 27, 2007 at 03:27 PM
Well they won, but no thanks to Renney or players like Aaron Ward. He is scary bad with the puck in his zone. Hossa played well, Shanny played well but remains snake bitten. Jagr came to play and thats good to see. I like Prucha blocking that shot at the end of the game, especially after the banging he took all game long. I still wish the Rangers would get a REAL enforcer so douchebags like Fedoruk would think twice about their cheapshots. I still think this team needs to shoot way more. 4 friggin posts this game so luck wasn't with them either. The Flyers made a game of it though which makes me wonder what happens when we play a good team. As they say, nothing changes if nothing changes...
Posted by: Laserman | January 27, 2007 at 03:36 PM
That game winner by Krog was great to see. Good, gritty goal. That's what we need. We need the other lines to start stepping up like this.
Posted by: Ros | January 27, 2007 at 03:41 PM
Czech Posse -- you're not allowed to insult us even in a foreign language that most of us don't understand (I however understand it). Post deleted.
Posted by: Dubi | January 27, 2007 at 03:52 PM
Dubi or Paws:
Any of you guys know if the Saginaw fans threw copies of GM's annual report after the first Spirit goal?
Posted by: oc1001 | January 27, 2007 at 04:03 PM
OC
No they did not but the Spirit fans I have been told are a great bunch who really are supportive of their team. They did make sure that everyone knew what was going to happen.
Czech Posse
Dude in any language your stuff is getting old and sad. Hossa does nothing and having watched him since he was a Winterhawk, I can say he is not going to get better so if you really want to love him to death then ask a team in the Czech league to sign him to a super sized contract.
In other words if you want him so bad then you can have him.
Posted by: Jess | January 27, 2007 at 05:16 PM
Stop insulting people because they think Hossa stinks.
Posted by: emscam | January 27, 2007 at 06:17 PM
Between Joe and Sam giving Hossa great praise, "best game he's played this year, etc, etc...I'm begining to think the organization is trying some way to showcase him. Big, strong defensive forward, sounds good to a playoff bound team. We know better. This was a big win, but the PP is still a big problem. Yes we got a GW goal from the fourh line but a 2-1 win against a weak team like Philly isn't good. Problems still abound in Rangerland.
Posted by: rangerbill94 | January 27, 2007 at 08:18 PM
WOW, Girardi is the real deal, he had more hits in this game than Rosival and Malik have had all season. Yeah, Pock gets benched which is idiotic.
Malik, Rosival, Ward and Rasuncek need to be benched before Pock and Girardi. It's only one game but based on what I saw, Girardi and Pock need to be in there every game. Malik, Rosival and Ruchunek and Ward need to sit. Renney is incapable of seeing that unfortunately.
Posted by: lennynyr | January 27, 2007 at 10:43 PM
Rangers in 60: Ward: What's he doin'? Where's the cover for Hollweg after getting blasted into the boards? Joe M. says we should skate away and not retaliate. Ugh. Richards on Tyutin. Basic Flyer MO. Finally we come in and stand up for Tyutin. Hey, Rangers are playing well for a change. I would argue, too, that we have played well against the upper tier teams. It's still a long season and we need to keep looking forward. And where is Dubinsky? Many posters believed he was arriving to go on the second line.
Posted by: NCSteve | January 27, 2007 at 11:19 PM
would rather have Kaspar/Pock than Malik/Ward/Girardi.. Team still can,t score goals (posts don't count)... Why wasn't Orr in lineup against Philly... Don't understand this coaching style at all... Something is going to have to give soon... Z
Posted by: craigz | January 28, 2007 at 12:04 AM
I sense another 7-game losing streak looming, and maybe it's just what we need to get some changes.
I just hope they change the coach before shipping out any kids. Although getting the eff out of here is the best thing that could happen for any young hockey player.
This team is a rest home for has-beens, never-weres, and never-will-be's. I feel terrible for Lundqvist, Prucha, Hollweg, Orts and the kids in Hartford. The rest of them can drop dead for all I care.
Posted by: baron34 | January 28, 2007 at 12:32 AM
I keep waiting for the relentlessly negative tone on this board to change, but I've given up hope. At least three-quarters of the posters here refuse to recognize ANY positives, and continue to slam the team and the coaches even after a "close only on the scoreboard" game. The Rangers played well in Philly and pretty much dominated, but people just want to moan. Many appear to be actively rooting against the Rangers, and a lot people seem to complain and vent just because it makes them feel better.
Posted by: Lurker Kev | January 28, 2007 at 03:49 AM
The negative tone will change Kev, when the team gives us a reason to change. Ask yourself when was the last time the Rangers have won a playoff game in the Sather regime. The answer is never!!
Sure it is nice when they win and play well but doing that only 50% or less of the time just doesn't cut it long term. There are positive incidences and events with them along the way but overall, nothing to be positive about.
Think it's a matter of the time frame you are discussing to define degrees of positve or negative reaction from us, the fans.
By the way, I don't own a dog so I can I beat on Sather/Renney/Maloney/Dolan??? Thank you.
Posted by: lennynyr | January 28, 2007 at 10:52 AM
I still can't get over Betts as Shanny's center. The guy shouldn't even be in the league. Can't someone shake some sense into the brainless trust? Ward on the first line? No Rangers in the Youngstars game too.
Posted by: Eric 415 | January 28, 2007 at 03:52 PM
Kev, I keep waiting for a playoff win, but I've given up hope with the current Rangers (mis)management. If you want to dance in the streets after a 1 goal win against the worst team in the league, be my guest. I just can't make the leap to believing the Rangers will win 21 of 34 games to make the playoffs after watching Saturday's effort.
2 points is 2 points, and that is exactly what that game was worth. 20 wins to go...
Lenny- Whack away, Pal! Use a Louisville Slugger.
Posted by: T_Bird | January 28, 2007 at 07:15 PM
Lurker Kev, you aren't Bobby Granger are you? He posts on Bird's site and Rodent's site with a similar handle.
Suspects?? Wisdom?? If you open your mind, you might find some here. Why the refusal to see the real world?? What are you afraid of?
Posted by: lennynyr | January 28, 2007 at 08:57 PM
Sgt. Sather's Lonely Fan's Club Band...
"It was seven years ago today,
Sgt. Sather taught the team to play,
They've been going in and out of style,
But their guaranteed to raise a smile,
So may I introduce to you
The team you've seen for all these years,
Sgt. Sather's Lonely Fan's Club Band.
We're Sgt. Sather's Lonely Fan's Club Band,
We hope you will enjoy the show,
We're Sgt. Sather's Lonely Fan's Club Band,
Sit back and let the evening go.
It's wonderful to be here,
It's certainly a thrill.
You're such a lovely audience,
We'd like to win the Cup for you,
We'd love to win the Cup.
I don't really want to stop the show,
But I thought that you might like to know,
That the fans are going to sing a song,
And he wants you all to sing along.
So let me introduce to you
The one and only Sgt. Sather's Lonely Fan's... Club... Baaaaand.
Posted by: T_Bird | January 28, 2007 at 09:29 PM
Dubi, you're killing me with the over-the-top editing of posts. Let people have at it! A whole platoon of posters have basically hijacked this board this season with ridiculous, unfunny, poorly informed, lowest common denominator commentary, and yet someone like myself who has been posting in this forum without making waves for far longer than they have can't challenge them back?
I honestly can't believe you thought the last post I wrote was so far out of line as to be stricken from the record. I was sarcastic, and nothing more than that. It really makes me wonder how much I can trust what I'm reading here. Obviously the readers aren't getting the right context about these posters if they haven't been allowed to see the totality of what they originally wrote. Edit the egregiously offensive stuff, sure, but let the readers see how civil and mature the posters really are - or are NOT - here.
And yes, I'm deliberately posting this publicly instead of privately because I feel there are others here who feel the same way, and if this starts a debate then all the better.
Posted by: Lurker Kev | January 28, 2007 at 09:59 PM
Dubi, you ruined all my sarcasm, now it looks like a Rangers Rah-Rah song. The name even fit in correctly....:)
Posted by: T_Bird | January 28, 2007 at 11:12 PM